YieldMaxCalc
Home/Compare/SCHD vs SCHG

SCHD vs SCHG: Dividend Income or Large-Cap Growth?

Schwab's dividend ETF against Schwab's large-cap growth ETF — a near-perfect split of the US market into the two factors most investors actually care about.

TL;DR

SCHG has dramatically outperformed SCHD since 2020 because of the mega-cap tech bull run. SCHG yields next to nothing (<0.5%); SCHD yields 3.5%+. A classic income-vs-growth tradeoff. Many investors hold both as a barbell.

Quick stats

MetricSCHDSCHG
Price$31.05$32.62
TTM yield3.40%0.39%
Real yield (NAV-adj.)4.22%0.55%
NAV change (period)24.1%41.7%
Annualized volatility1181.1%1712.3%
Distribution frequencyquarterlyquarterly
Expense ratio0.06%0.04%
Inception2011-10-202009-12-11
AUM~$70B~$30B
1Y dividend CAGR-32.1%6.2%
3Y dividend CAGR7.0%15.2%
5Y dividend CAGR9.2%6.8%
5Y price CAGR4.5%13.3%

Strategy & holdings

These are two sides of the Schwab ETF lineup. SCHD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index — quality-screened dividend payers. SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index — large-cap growth companies selected by earnings growth, sales growth, and price momentum. The two portfolios are almost non-overlapping.

SCHDSchwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

Dividend-focused: 10-year dividend history plus quality screens. Heavy on financials, staples, healthcare. Excludes most mega-cap tech. ~100 holdings.

SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

Large-cap growth: Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, Tesla dominate the top weights. ~250 holdings. Essentially a growth-tilted mega-cap fund.

This is one of the cleanest pair comparisons because the overlap is minimal. SCHG holds the companies that drove the 2020s bull market (mega-cap tech) and excludes dividend payers. SCHD holds quality dividend payers and excludes most mega-cap tech. Holding both together gives you broad US equity exposure (comparable to VOO) with an income tilt. Holding either alone gives you a concentrated factor bet — growth or dividend.

Yield & distributions

SCHD yields 3.5-4%. SCHG yields under 0.5%, often closer to 0.3%. This is not a 'yield comparison' — SCHG's dividend is incidental. If you want income, SCHD is the only answer of the two. SCHG's role is pure total return through capital appreciation.

Total return & NAV

SCHG has crushed SCHD on total return over 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y windows. The gap has been substantial — often 7-10 percentage points annualized. This is entirely a function of the mega-cap tech bull market. In a value or dividend-led regime (think 2000-2010), the result would reverse. The honest assessment is that SCHG's outperformance is regime-dependent, but recent regime has strongly favored growth.

Risk & volatility

SCHD
Annualized volatility
1181.1%
NAV change (1Y)
+24.1%
SCHG
Annualized volatility
1712.3%
NAV change (1Y)
+41.7%

SCHG is meaningfully more volatile than SCHD. Max drawdowns during corrections have been 25-35% for SCHG vs 15-20% for SCHD. SCHG also has extreme concentration — the top 10 holdings are often 50%+ of the fund. Any prolonged tech correction hits SCHG hard. SCHD's defensive sector mix provides real downside protection that SCHG cannot match.

Tax treatment

Both are tax-efficient but for different reasons. SCHG generates almost no taxable income because it pays minimal dividends — any taxable event is usually a capital gains sale. SCHD generates qualified dividend income but at LTCG rates. SCHG is 'buy-and-hold' tax efficient; SCHD is 'pays as you go' tax efficient.

SCHD
Ordinary income~5%
Qualified dividends~95%
Return of capital~0%
Nearly all qualified dividends — LTCG rates.
SCHG
Ordinary income~5%
Qualified dividends~95%
Return of capital~0%
Tiny dividend — tax impact negligible.

Which should you pick?

You want maximum total return and have 10+ year horizon
SCHG
Large-cap growth has been the best-performing factor for over a decade. High concentration, high reward, high volatility.
You want current income
SCHD
SCHG pays essentially no dividend. SCHD is the income engine of the pair.
You're in retirement and need spending income
SCHD (or split favoring SCHD)
SCHG's volatility and lack of yield make it less suitable for drawdown. SCHD's consistent growing dividend is purpose-built for this.
You're building a retirement portfolio 15+ years out
SCHG (or split favoring SCHG)
More total return potential. Income matters less when the horizon is long and reinvesting.
You want a balanced US equity exposure
50/50 SCHD + SCHG
Combined, they approximate a dividend-tilted S&P 500 with minimal holdings overlap.

FAQ

Is SCHD or SCHG better?
They solve different problems. SCHG has dramatically outperformed on total return thanks to mega-cap tech. SCHD pays 10x the yield and is more defensive in corrections. 'Better' depends on whether you need income (SCHD) or maximum growth (SCHG).
Does SCHG beat SCHD long-term?
Over the last decade, yes — significantly. But this has been driven by one of the largest growth-factor bull markets in history. In prior decades (2000-2010), dividend and value stocks beat growth. Future outperformance is not guaranteed.
Can I hold both SCHD and SCHG?
Yes, and it's one of the more sensible combinations in the Schwab lineup. The holdings overlap is minimal, so combining them gives you broad US equity exposure with both a growth tilt and an income tilt. 50/50 is common.
Which is riskier?
SCHG by a clear margin. Much higher volatility, deeper drawdowns, more concentration in a handful of mega-cap tech names.
Which has more dividend growth?
SCHD — it's specifically designed around dividend growth. SCHG's dividend is incidental and grows slowly.
Related comparisons